Re: Corrigendum #9

From: Asmus Freytag <>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:49:29 -0700

On 6/2/2014 9:38 AM, Shawn Steele wrote:
>>> I agree with Markus; I think the FAQ is pretty clear. (And if not,
>>> that's where we should make it clearer.)
>> But the formal wording of the standard should reflect that clarity, right?
> I don't tend to read the FAQ :)

FAQ's are useful, but they are not binding. They are even less binding
than general explanation in the text of the Core specification, which
itself doesn't rise to the that of conformance clauses and definition...

Doug's unease about the "upside-down" nature of the wording regarding
PUA and noncharacters is something that should be addressed in revised
text in the core specification.

> _______________________________________________
> Unicode mailing list

Unicode mailing list
Received on Mon Jun 02 2014 - 11:50:06 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 02 2014 - 11:50:06 CDT