On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Much as I don't like their uninvited use, it is possible to pass them
> and other undesirables through most applications by a slight bit of
> recoding at the application's boundaries. Using 99 = (3 + 32 + 64) PUA
> characters, one can ape UTF-16 surrogates and encode:
What's the point? If we can use the PUA, then we don't need the
noncharacters; we can just use the PUA directly. If we have to play
around with remapping them, they're pointless; they're no easier to
use in that case then ESC or '\' or PUA characters.
-- Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list Unicode_at_unicode.org http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicodeReceived on Tue Jun 03 2014 - 01:23:10 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 03 2014 - 01:23:11 CDT