Re: Corrigendum #9

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Richard Wordingham
<richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:21:38 -0700
> David Starner <prosfilaes_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Richard Wordingham
>> <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com> wrote:
>> > Using 99 = (3 +
>> > 32 + 64) PUA characters, one can ape UTF-16 surrogates and encode:
>
> The PUA is in general not available for
> general utilities to make special use of.

No, the PUA is not. Then where are you getting the 99 PUA characters
you suggested using?

-- 
Kie ekzistas vivo, ekzistas espero.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode