On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:09:27 +0900
"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst_at_it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
> I'd strongly suggest that completely independent of when and how
> Corrigendum #9 gets tweaked or fixed, a quick and firm plan gets
> worked out for how to get rid of these codepoints in CLDR data. The
> sooner, the better.
I suspect this has already been done. I know of no CLDR text files
still containing them.
Richard.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Tue Jun 03 2014 - 14:00:27 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 03 2014 - 14:00:27 CDT