Apparent discrepanccy between FAQ and Age.txt

From: Karl Williamson <public_at_khwilliamson.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:22:22 -0600

The FAQ http://www.unicode.org/faq/private_use.html#sentinels
says that the last 2 code points on the planes except BMP were made
noncharacters in TUS 3.1. DerivedAge.txt gives 2.0 for these.

"The conformance wording about U+FFFE and U+FFFF changed somewhat in
Unicode 2.0, but these were still the only two code points with this
unique status"

Unicode 3.1 [2001] was the watershed for the development of
noncharacters in the standard. Unicode 3.1 was the first version to add
supplementary characters to the standard. As a result, it also had to
come to grips with the fact the ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 had reserved the
last two code points for every plane as "not a character"
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Tue Jun 10 2014 - 11:23:46 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jun 10 2014 - 11:23:46 CDT