Re: Thai unalom symbol

From: James Clark <>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 14:48:16 +0700

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <> wrote:

> Is there evidence of its use in text? This should be an essential question
> when discussing whether it should be defined as a Unicode character. Use as
> “logo” or, rather, as a standalone graphic symbol does not really mean it
> is used as a character.

It is a standalone graphic symbol with a religious and astrological
significance. There are a number such symbols in Unicode, for example:
U+2626-U+262A, and U+1F540-U+1F54A. My understanding is that such symbols
are eligible to be encoded in Unicode, though there are many factors to


Unicode mailing list
Received on Wed Jul 02 2014 - 02:49:38 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 02 2014 - 02:49:38 CDT