Re: Bliss?

From: Jean-François Colson <jf_at_colson.eu>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 02:47:52 +0200

Le 14/10/14 00:22, Michael Everson a écrit :
> Marcus, that was ill-informed. No reason to give to Jean-françois a generic FAQ entry.
>
> Better to describe the UTC discussion about the script. Their chief concern at that time was that the user community were still creating new characters. The user community has been working on this in the intervening years, and Bliss is much closer to maturity for encoding.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>

The script wasn’t mature enough. Does that mean that the shape of many
characters changed in the following years?

You say their chief concern was that the user community were still
creating new characters. But isn’t that inherent to most living
ideographic scripts? Aren’t there new characters that appear here and
there in Chinese/Japanese/Korean?

_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
Unicode_at_unicode.org
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
Received on Mon Oct 13 2014 - 19:49:06 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 13 2014 - 19:49:06 CDT