Re: New Unicode Emoji draft, available for review

From: Rick McGowan <>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:48:01 -0800

FYI, Posting this on behalf of Mark Davis... Something in his original
reply message is apparently toxic to our mail gateway that it can't get
through. (Investigating.)

May be the literal U+1F4A9, which I have (I'm sorry) redacted below.



> Could be either one [U+1F4A9]
> The exact contents of minimal and optional characters is something
that we
> want to get feedback on. But I don't think [U+1F4A9] is in the running!
> BTW, I'm seeing about 250 new news articles on this, per hour (in
> Plus a scattering of others, s.a.

Unicode mailing list
Received on Wed Nov 05 2014 - 15:52:12 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Nov 05 2014 - 15:52:12 CST