Re: Unicode encoding policy

From: Doug Ewell <>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:32:59 -0700

Asmus Freytag wrote:

> The "critical mass" of support is now assumed for currency symbols,
> some special symbols like emoji, and should be granted to additional
> types of symbols, punctuations and letters, whenever there is an
> "authority" that controls normative orthography or notation.
> Whether this is for an orthography reform in some country or addition
> to the standard math symbols supported by AMS journals, such external
> adoption can signify immediate "critical need" and "critical mass of
> option" for the relevant characters.

To me, it is remarkable that the "critical mass of support" argument
that is applied, entirely appropriately, to new currency symbols
(however misguided the motives for such might be) and math symbols and
characters for people's names, is now also applied to BURRITO and

But then, I remember when folks used to cite the WG2 "Principles and
Procedures" document for examples of what was and was not a good
candidate for encoding. That seems so long ago now.

Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, USA | ­ 
Unicode mailing list
Received on Mon Dec 29 2014 - 12:34:08 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 29 2014 - 12:34:09 CST