RE: Tag characters

From: Peter Constable <petercon_at_microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 03:22:28 +0000

Evidently there were more than two type of people. There are those who feel 50 years is long enough; there are others who feel that five years is long enough; there are likely others that feel 75 or 30 or some other values are long enough. Then there are also those who feel that any finite length is probably not long enough.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:01 AM
To: Unicode Mailing List
Cc: William_J_G Overington
Subject: Re: Tag characters

William_J_G Overington <wjgo underscore 10009 at btinternet dot com>
wrote:

>> Hopefully the MA will adhere to the new 50-year limit.
>
> What is MA please?

Maintenance Agency:
http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/country_codes.htm

> A 50-year limit seems far too short a time.

There are two types of people: those who feel 50 years is too short, and those who feel it is too long.

Fifty years is much better than five, which was the previous limit.

--
Doug Ewell | http://ewellic.org | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
Received on Tue May 19 2015 - 22:23:51 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 19 2015 - 22:23:52 CDT