Re: Tag characters

From: Asmus Freytag (t) <asmus-inc_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:25:56 -0700

On 5/21/2015 8:46 AM, Peter Constable wrote:
>
> Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL
> service?
>

I suspect both Eric and I may have have been slightly tongue-in-cheek
with respect to UFLs...

... not sure about anybody else.

Cheers,

A./
>
> P
>
> *From:*Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces_at_unicode.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Asmus Freytag (t)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2015 10:15 PM
> *To:* Eric Muller; unicode_at_unicode.org
> *Subject:* Re: Tag characters
>
> On 5/20/2015 9:57 PM, Eric Muller wrote:
>
> On 5/20/2015 7:11 PM, Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> In any event, URLs that point to images would be an awful
> basis for an encoding.
>
>
> I would make an exception for the URL
> http://unicode.org/Public/8.0.0/ucd/StandardizedFlags.html
> <http://unicode.org/Public/8.0.0/ucd/StandardizedFlags.html>.
>
> Eric.
>
>
> Currently that gives me
>
>
> Not Found
>
> The requested URL /Public/8.0.0/ucd/StandardizedFlags.html was
> not found on this server.
>
>
> :)
>
> However, I agree, all we need to do is create a UFL (Universal Flag
> Locator) and we can keep it as stable as we want.
>
> A./
>
Received on Thu May 21 2015 - 15:26:58 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu May 21 2015 - 15:26:58 CDT