RE: Tag characters

From: Peter Constable <>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:10:46 +0000

Well, the same reasoning could also argue for the contra-positive (a→b ⊨ ¬b→¬a): that UTC should not consider endorsing such a tag scheme.


From: William_J_G Overington []
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:54 AM
To:; Peter Constable;;
Subject: Re: Tag characters

Peter Constable wrote as follows:

> Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service?

Well, Unicode is about precision, interoperability and long-term stability, and, given, in relation to one particular specified base character followed by some tag characters, that a particular sequence of Unicode characters is intended to lead to the display of an image representing a particular flag, it seems to me highly reasonable that the Unicode Technical Committee might seriously consider providing that facility.

William Overington

27 May 2015

Received on Wed May 27 2015 - 11:11:08 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 27 2015 - 11:11:08 CDT