Re: Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters

From: Doug Ewell <>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:42:38 -0700

Sean Leonard wrote:

> Additionally as Peter stated, an expression including "Basic Latin
> block" (e.g., characters beyond the Basic Latin block) could work.

I was thinking that something like "non–Basic-Latin Unicode" might be
useful. It avoids the confusion of referring to ASCII as a range of code
points instead of a separate encoding standard.

Doug Ewell | | Thornton, CO 🇺🇸
Received on Mon Sep 21 2015 - 10:43:47 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 21 2015 - 10:43:47 CDT