On 01/11/2016 10:55 PM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
> Looks that way to me too. Can you submit this as feedback?
will do
>
> {phone}
>
> On Jan 12, 2016 00:39, "Karl Williamson" <public_at_khwilliamson.com
> <mailto:public_at_khwilliamson.com>> wrote:
>
> Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
>
> has these two rules
>
> NU × (NU | SY | IS)
>
> NU (NU | SY | IS)* × (NU | SY | IS | CL | CP )
>
> It appears to me that the first rule generates a subset of what the
> 2nd rule generates, and so is useless. It could be hence removed
> for simplicity, unless I'm missing something or there is a typo and
> it is meant to generate something else.
>
Received on Tue Jan 12 2016 - 00:27:12 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 12 2016 - 00:27:12 CST