Re: non-breaking snakes

From: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham_at_ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 08:27:55 +0100

On Wed, 4 May 2016 07:54:48 +0100 (BST)
Julian Bradfield <jcb+unicode_at_inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:

> See
> http://xkcd.com/1676/
> (making sure to look at the mouse-over text)

I though kashida (TATWEEL) was a precedent not to be followed. The
issue of course, is that chained snakes do not reflow well, just as
filler text doesn't.

Richard.
Received on Wed May 04 2016 - 02:28:56 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Khaled Hosny: "Re: non-breaking snakes"
Previous message: Tex Texin: "RE: non-breaking snakes"
In reply to: Julian Bradfield: "non-breaking snakes"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: non-breaking snakes"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 04 2016 - 02:28:56 CDT