RE: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block

From: Jonathan Rosenne <jonathan.rosenne_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:10:15 +0300

Rashi is a font, not a script. It has a one-to-one correspondence with
standard Hebrew.

Best Regards,

Jonathan Rosenne

054-4246522
-----Original Message-----
From: Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces_at_unicode.org] On Behalf Of Michael
Everson
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 8:59 PM
To: unicode_at_unicode.org
Subject: Re: The Hebrew Extended (Proposed) Block

On 13 May 2016, at 18:31, Ori Avtalion <ori_at_avtalion.name> wrote:

> Any plans for Rashi Script? It doesn't seem to fit any of the
> categories you listed. Arguably, it's just a font, but there's
> precedence in Unicode :)

Not good precedent, I think. Rashi would be best considered like Fraktur and
Latin.

Michael Everson
Received on Fri May 13 2016 - 14:10:52 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 13 2016 - 14:10:52 CDT