Re: "textels"

From: Janusz S. Bień <>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 06:44:08 +0200

On Tue, Sep 20 2016 at 18:09 CEST, writes:
> Janusz Bień wrote:
>> For me it means that Swift's characters are equivalence classes of the
>> set of extended grapheme clusters by canonical equivalence relation.
> I still hope we can come to some conclusion on the correct Unicode name
> for this concept. I don't think non-Unicode interpretations of terms
> like "grapheme" are grounds for throwing out "grapheme cluster,"

I agree.

> but I can see that the equivalence class itself is lacking a name.


> Note that the Swift definition doesn't say that <00E9> and <0065 0301>
> are identical entities, only that the language compares them as equal.

I'm fully aware of this.

Best regards


Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bien -  Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bien - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department),,
Received on Tue Sep 20 2016 - 23:45:16 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 20 2016 - 23:45:16 CDT