Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?

From: Leonardo Boiko <leoboiko_at_namakajiri.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:08:02 -0300

2016-10-03 14:51 GMT-03:00 Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela_at_cs.tut.fi>:

> They are not control or formatting characters. They are markup used at
> higher protocol levels – in different markup systems
>
>
That's exactly the point, yes.
Received on Mon Oct 03 2016 - 13:08:17 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Neil Harris: "Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"
Previous message: Steve Swales: "Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"
In reply to: Jukka K. Korpela: "Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"
Next in thread: Steve Swales: "Re: Why incomplete subscript/superscript alphabet ?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 03 2016 - 13:08:17 CDT