Re: XCCS (was: Historical question about 'universal signs')

From: seth erickson <sr.erickson_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:20:06 -0700

See pg. 57-63 of this:

Xerox. (1985). *Xerox System Network Architecture: General Information
Manua*l (No. XNSG 068504). Retrieved from
http://archive.org/details/bitsavers_xeroxxnsXNNetworkArchitectureGeneralInformationMan_10024221

SE

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Doug Ewell <doug_at_ewellic.org> wrote:

> seth erickson wrote:
>
> XCCS is fairly well documented
>>
>
> That hasn't been my experience. I'd be interested in any links you can
> forward that go beyond "Unicode built on" or "drew ideas from" or "was
> influenced by" XCCS.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org
>
Received on Mon Oct 24 2016 - 23:20:39 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 24 2016 - 23:20:41 CDT