Re: The (Klingon) Empire Strikes Back

From: Michael Everson <>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:18:49 +0000

On 16 Nov 2016, at 01:47, Mark E. Shoulson <> wrote:
> The defensiveness was not that Tolkienian scholarship was deemed "worthy", but more that Klingon's apparently was not.

Back in the day? No. It wasn’t.

> There was a Roadmap with pIqaD on it, and indeed you were the one who put it there. Nick Nicholas, in credits you with a "delightful move of defiance" for replacing pIqaD with Sarati when it was removed.

That would be me.

>> The Roadmaps are really of no consequence. They’re useful, but they have no status and are subject to any kind of change before ballotting ends.
> Getting pIqaD off the "not-roadmapped" list is more important, both symbolically and, as Ken Whistler says, practically.

Ha’ ruch.

Received on Tue Nov 15 2016 - 20:19:50 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 15 2016 - 20:19:50 CST