Re: Best practices for replacing UTF-8 overlongs

From: Ken Whistler <>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:47:10 -0800

On 12/20/2016 10:33 AM, Markus Scherer wrote:
> Yes. However, some of the discussion in this thread is due to details
> that were not spelled out in the PRI. There is basically a 2a and a
> 2b, while the examples in PRI #121 work the same in both variants.

I wasn't intending to argue the case one way or the other, but rather
just to point people to the historical context for the text as it
currently is in the standard, since that came up in discussion.

Received on Tue Dec 20 2016 - 12:47:40 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 20 2016 - 12:47:40 CST