Re: RFCs go Unicode

From: Mark Davis ☕️ <mark_at_macchiato.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 07:59:49 -0800

That's great news. It will be so much clearer to be able to have examples
with the real characters in them, and to be able to acknowledge the work of
authors with the real forms of their names.

Mark

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Andre Schappo <A.Schappo_at_lboro.ac.uk> wrote:

> RFC 7997: The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs https://tools.ietf.org/
> pdf/rfc7997.pdf
>
> I especially like recommendation to allow person names to be written in
> their native scripts. The native script form is placed first and thus
> treated as primary, as it should be IMHO. The romanised/ASCII form is
> placed second and bracketed, and thus treated as secondary, as it should be
> IMHO.
>
> eg from section 3.2
>
> 吴钦 (Q. Wu)
>
> André Schappo
>
>
Received on Sun Feb 05 2017 - 10:00:52 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Feb 05 2017 - 10:00:52 CST