Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

From: Michael Everson <>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:33:00 +0100

On 26 Mar 2017, at 18:20, Doug Ewell <> wrote:
> Michael Everson wrote:
>> One practical consequence of changing the chart glyphs now, for instance, would be that it would invalidate every existing Deseret font. Adding new characters would not.
> I thought the chart glyphs were not normative.

Come on, Doug. The letter W is a ligature of V and V. But sure, the glyphs are only informative, so why don’t we use an OO ligature instead?

Received on Sun Mar 26 2017 - 12:33:23 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Mar 26 2017 - 12:33:23 CDT