Re: Encoding of old compatibility characters

From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:09:00 -0700

On 3/28/2017 4:00 AM, Ian Clifton wrote:

I’ve used ⏨ a couple of times, without explanation, in my own
emails—without, as far as I’m aware, causing any misunderstanding.

Works especially well, whenever it renders as a box with 23E8 inscribed!

A./

Received on Tue Mar 28 2017 - 08:09:26 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?"
In reply to: Ian Clifton: "Re: Encoding of old compatibility characters"
Next in thread: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Encoding of old compatibility characters"
Reply: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Encoding of old compatibility characters"
Reply: Leo Broukhis: "Re: Encoding of old compatibility characters"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 28 2017 - 08:09:26 CDT