> `150` in UN M.49 which ISO 3166-1 was derived from and is compatible
with. CLDR
could safely adopt that if needed.
No need to "safely adopt". It is already valid:
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/proposed.html#flag-emoji-tag-sequences
If you follow the links you'll end up at
http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/common/validity/region.xml
And find that 150 is already valid. (For the format of that file, see LDML.)
====
Where people have looked at the documentation and their questions are still
not answered, that feedback is useful so that the documentation can be
improved. But it appears that at least some people haven't bothered to do
that, when it could answer a lot of the questions/complaints on this list.
Mark
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Christoph Päper <
christoph.paeper_at_crissov.de> wrote:
> Philippe Verdy <verdy_p_at_wanadoo.fr> hat am 30. März 2017 um 00:40
> geschrieben:
>
> > There's no ISO 3166-1 code for Europe at the whole (does it exist
> legally if
> > we can't clearly define its borders?)
>
> `150` in UN M.49 which ISO 3166-1 was derived from and is compatible with.
> CLDR
> could safely adopt that if needed.
>
> No alpha-2 and hence no RIS sequence, though. An Emoji Tag Sequence would
> be
> straight-forward, though: U+1F3F4-E0031-E0035-E0030-E007F.
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 30 2017 - 07:00:29 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 30 2017 - 07:00:30 CDT