Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

On 16 May 2017, at 19:36, Markus Scherer <markus.icu_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let me try to address some of the issues raised here.

Thanks for jumping in.

The one thing I wanted to ask about was the “without ever restricting trail bytes to less than 80..BF”. I think that could be misinterpreted; having thought about it some more, I think you mean “considering any trailing byte in the range 80..BF as valid”. The “less than” threw me the first few times I read it and I started thinking you meant allowing any byte as a trailing byte, which is clearly not right.

Otherwise, I’m happy :-)

Kind regards,

Alastair.

--
http://alastairs-place.net