There's some sort of rule that proposals should be made seven days in advance of the meeting. I can't find it now, so I'm not sure whether the actual rule was followed, let alone what authority it has.
Ideally, proposals that update algorithms or properties of some significance should be required to be reviewed in more than one pass. The procedures of the UTC are a bit weak in that respect, at least compared to other standards organizations. The PRI process addresses that issue to some extent.
A./
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 17 2017 - 18:42:13 CDT