Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

From: Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 16:41:53 -0700
On 5/17/2017 2:31 PM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
There's some sort of rule that proposals should be made seven days in
advance of the meeting.  I can't find it now, so I'm not sure whether
the actual rule was followed, let alone what authority it has.

Ideally, proposals that update algorithms or properties of some significance should be required to be reviewed in more than one pass. The procedures of the UTC are a bit weak in that respect, at least compared to other standards organizations. The PRI process addresses that issue to some extent.

A./

Received on Wed May 17 2017 - 18:42:12 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 17 2017 - 18:42:13 CDT