Re: Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

From: Doug Ewell via Unicode <>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 13:42:58 -0700

Asmus Freytag \(c\) wrote:

> And why add a recommendation that changes that from completely up to
> the implementation (or groups of implementations) to something where
> one way of doing it now has to justify itself?

A recommendation already exists, at the end of Section 3.9. The current
proposal is to change it to recommend something else.

Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US |
Received on Tue May 23 2017 - 15:43:58 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 23 2017 - 15:43:59 CDT