Unicode Mail List Archive: by date

Thursday, 1 February
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises - Correction Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Friday, 2 February
- Shopify Joins as Full Member of the Unicode Consortium announcements_at_unicode.org
- Shopify Joins as Full Member of the Unicode Consortium announcements_at_unicode.org
Monday, 5 February
- Re: Internationalised Computer Science Exercises Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Wednesday, 7 February
- Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now final for 2018 announcements_at_unicode.org
- What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? Theppitak Karoonboonyanan via Unicode
Thursday, 8 February
- Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: What is U+0E46 THAI CHARACTER MAIYAMOK? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Friday, 9 February
- Cross-Locale Keyboard Features for the General Public Marcel Schneider via Unicode
Sunday, 11 February
- Fwd: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now final for 2018 Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
Tuesday, 13 February
- Emoji blooper Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: Emoji blooper Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: Emoji blooper Markus Scherer via Unicode
Wednesday, 14 February
- Why so much emoji nonsense? Erik Pedersen via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Konstantin Ritt via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Stephane Bortzmeyer via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Alastair Houghton via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: UNICODE vehicle vanity registration? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Martin J. DÃ¼rst via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
Thursday, 15 February
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Christoph PÃ¤per via Unicode
- Unicode of Death 2.0 James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- RE: Why so much emoji nonsense? Shawn Steele via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? - Proscription Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations Oren Watson via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- RE: Why so much emoji nonsense? - Proscription Shawn Steele via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations Nelson H. F. Beebe via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? - Proscription James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Origin of Alphasyllabaries (was: Why so much emoji nonsense?) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Phake Nick via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Pierpaolo Bernardi via Unicode
- +1 (was: Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- End of discussion, please â€” Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
Friday, 16 February
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Phake Nick via Unicode
- Re: End of discussion, please â€” Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Invisible characters must be specified to be visible in security-sensitive situations Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Mark Davis â˜•ï¸ via Unicode
- Re: Origin of Alphasyllabaries (was: Why so much emoji nonsense?) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Phake Nick via Unicode
- Re: Origin of Alphasyllabaries (was: Why so much emoji nonsense?) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- IDC's versus Egyptian format controls (was: Re: Why so much emoji nonsense?) Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls James Kass via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls James Kass via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls James Kass via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls James Kass via Unicode
Saturday, 17 February
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Christoph PÃ¤per via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Marcel Schneider via Unicode
- metric for block coverage Adam Borowski via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage David Starner via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
Sunday, 18 February
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Manish Goregaokar via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Adam Borowski via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Adam Borowski via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 13 Janusz S. BieÅ„ via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage James Kass via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Eli Zaretskii via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Janusz S. BieÅ„ via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 13 Adam Borowski via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 13 Janusz S. BieÅ„ via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Unicode of Death 2.0 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage David Starner via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Leonardo Boiko via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Why so much emoji nonsense? Marcel Schneider via Unicode
Monday, 19 February
- Re: metric for block coverage =?utf-8?Q? J.=C2=A0S._Choi ?= via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Bobby de Vos via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Tuesday, 20 February
- AW: metric for block coverage Dreiheller, Albrecht via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Garth Wallace via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Michael Everson via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Anshuman Pandey via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Phake Nick via Unicode
Wednesday, 21 February
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Robert Wheelock via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Robert Wheelock via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Khaled Hosny via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Suggestions? Jeb Eldridge via Unicode
- Re: Suggestions? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Suggestions? Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? John W Kennedy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag \(c\) via Unicode
- Re: Suggestions? James Kass via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? David Starner via Unicode
- Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- Re: Suggestions? David Starner via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Christoph Päper via Unicode
- Re: Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Asmus Freytag via Unicode
- Re: Coloured Characters (was: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Richard Wordingham via Unicode
Thursday, 22 February
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls Martin J. DÃ¼rst via Unicode
- Re: IDC's versus Egyptian format controls James Kass via Unicode
- Re: Coloured Characters Richard Wordingham via Unicode
- AW: metric for block coverage Dreiheller, Albrecht via Unicode
- Re: Coloured Characters William_J_G Overington via Unicode
- Bidi edge cases in Hangul and Indic David Corbett via Unicode
- Re: Bidi edge cases in Hangul and Indic Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Bidi edge cases in Hangul and Indic David Corbett via Unicode
- Re: Bidi edge cases in Hangul and Indic Ken Whistler via Unicode
- Re: Suggestions? via Unicode
Friday, 23 February
- Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character? Martin J. DÃ¼rst via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Norbert Lindenberg via Unicode
Saturday, 24 February
- Unicode CLDR 33 alpha available for testing announcements_at_unicode.org
Monday, 26 February
- Adopt-A-Character Grant to Support Three Historic Scripts announcements_at_unicode.org
Tuesday, 27 February
- RE: metric for block coverage Peter Constable via Unicode
- Missing Kazakh Latin letters (was: Re: 0027, 02BC, 2019, or a new character?) Doug Ewell via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 20 Neil Patel via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 20 Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: metric for block coverage Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! announcements_at_unicode.org
Wednesday, 28 February
- RE: Unicode Digest, Vol 50, Issue 20 Peter Constable via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Janusz S. BieÅ„ via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Martin J. DÃ¼rst via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Mark Davis â˜•ï¸ via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Janusz S. BieÅ„ via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Mark Davis â˜•ï¸ via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Christoph PÃ¤per via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: Bidi edge cases in Hangul and Indic QSJN 4 UKR via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Andrew West via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! Philippe Verdy via Unicode
- Re: Unicode Emoji 11.0 characters now ready for adoption! via Unicode

Last message date: Wed Feb 28 2018 - 21:31:42 CST
Archived on: Wed Feb 28 2018 - 21:31:44 CST

Unicode Mail List Archive by date