On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 09:42:38 +0800
via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> to the best of my knowledge virtually no new characters used just for
> names are under consideration, all the ones that are under
> consideration are from before this century.
What I was interested in was the rate of generation of new
CJK characters in general, not just those for names. I appreciate that
encoding is dominated by the backlog of older characters.
Richard.
Received on Thu Mar 08 2018 - 17:06:40 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 08 2018 - 17:06:40 CST