Re: Can NFKC turn valid UAX 31 identifiers into non-identifiers?

From: Asmus Freytag via Unicode <>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 18:56:37 -0700
On 6/6/2018 2:25 PM, Hans Åberg via Unicode wrote:

On 4 Jun 2018, at 21:49, Manish Goregaokar via Unicode <> wrote:

The Rust community is considering adding non-ascii identifiers, which follow UAX #31 (XID_Start XID_Continue*, with tweaks). The proposal also asks for identifiers to be treated as equivalent under NFKC.
So, in this language, if one defines a projection function 𝜋 and the usual constant π, what is 𝜋(π) supposed to mean? - Just curious.

In a language where one writes ASCII "pi" instead, what is pi(pi) supposed to mean?


Received on Wed Jun 06 2018 - 20:56:49 CDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 06 2018 - 20:56:50 CDT