> > From the outset, Unicode and the US national body tried repeatedly to engage with SC35 and SC35/WG5,
[…]
> As a reminder: The actual SC35 is in total disconnect from the same SC35 as it was from the mid-eighties to mid-nineties and beyond.
Edit: ISO/IEC JTC1 SC35 was founded in 1999. (In the mentioned timespan, there was SC18/WG9.)
> > informing them of UTS #35 (LDML) and CLDR, but were ignored. SC35 didn’t appear to be interested
> [, or appeared to be interested in ]
> > a pet project and not in what is actually being used in industry.
It seems it isn’t even a pet project, today it’s just nothing but a deplorable mismanagement mess. In my opinion, at
some point the inadvertant French NB will apologize to the US National Body and to the Unicode Consortium.
As of now, I apologize for my part.
Best regards,
Marcel
Received on Mon Jun 11 2018 - 04:29:20 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 11 2018 - 04:29:26 CDT