Rebecca Bettencourt wrote,
> Why don't we just get Blissymbolics encoded as it is?
The Pipeline still has the Everson proposal from 1998, but Blissymbols
are still in the Pipeline.
Scripts Encoding Initiative
( http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei/ )
page,
http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei/scripts-not-encoded.html
shows Blissymbols and links the same proposal.
Blissymbolics Communication International,
http://www.blissymbolics.org/
will likely produce the next proposal.
Both Scripts Encoding Initiative and Blissymbolics Communication
International depend upon funding.
Received on Tue Aug 21 2018 - 08:17:49 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 21 2018 - 08:17:49 CDT