On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 20:34:20 +0200
"Janusz S. Bień via Unicode" <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> This is a typical but IMHO obsolete perspective. Fonts are for
> *rendering*, new characters and variants are more and more often
> needed for *input* of real life old texts with sufficient precision.
If we're talking about glyphs which don't actually correspond to new
characters, then that sounds like a good case for private use variation
selectors. To quote Tully, "Abusus non tollit usum".
Richard.
Received on Thu Aug 23 2018 - 15:38:05 CDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 23 2018 - 15:38:05 CDT