Re: A last missing link for interoperable representation

From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:37:15 +0000

On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:02:49 +0100
Hans ร…berg via Unicode <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:

> > On 14 Jan 2019, at 23:43, James Kass via Unicode
> > <unicode_at_unicode.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hans ร…berg wrote,
> >
> > > How about using U+0301 COMBINING ACUTE ACCENT: ๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ ๐‘ ๐‘’ฬ
> >
> > Thought about using a combining accent. Figured it would just
> > display with a dotted circle but neglected to try it out first. It
> > actually renders perfectly here. /That's/ good to know. (smile)
>
> It is a bit off here. One can try math, too: the derivative of ๐›พ(๐‘ก)
> is ๐›พฬ‡(๐‘ก).

No it isn't. You should be using a spacing character for
differentiation. On the other hand, one uses a combining circumflex
for Fourier transforms.

Richard.
Received on Mon Jan 14 2019 - 17:37:32 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jan 14 2019 - 17:37:32 CST