This page is a compilation of formal public feedback received so far. See Feedback for further information on this issue, how to discuss it, and how to provide feedback.
Date/Time: Tue Mar 11 11:10:10 CDT 2014
Name: Per Starbäck
Report Type: Public Review Issue
Opt Subject: PRI#260, UTS#10, Swedish example
This comment is not about anything changed by PRI#260, but about something I think should have been changed. In "1. Introduction": > > just as "v" and "w" sort as if they were the same base letter in > > Swedish, a loose search should pick up words with either one of > > them. This has traditionally been true for Swedish, but is nowadays an unfortunate example as often v and w don't sort as the same base letter anymore. (They don't in CLDR by default since 2007 for example.) If Swedish is kept as an example, I suggest replacing "sort" with "traditionally sort" (or "sometimes sort") in the quote just to make it correct. The continuation later (in section 1.5) will work then. If it is replaced with a totally different example, probably the example in 1.5 should be changed as well to follow suit.