Accumulated Feedback on PRI #315

This page is a compilation of formal public feedback received so far. See Feedback for further information on this issue, how to discuss it, and how to provide feedback.

Date/Time: Wed Feb 17 08:35:26 CST 2016
Name: Eriice
Report Type: Error Report
Opt Subject: About writing mistake

Hello, There is a little writing mistake in UNICODE BIDIRECTIONAL ALGORITHM.
You can find it in section 3.2, Bidirectional Character Types. In this
section, text about "See Section 8.2, Arabic of [Unicode]" should be corrected
to "See Section 9.2", because the section "Arabic" appear in Section 9.2
instead of Section 8.2 of Unicode.

URL:http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#Bidirectional_Character_Types

Furthermore, are there any language translation about the Unicode Standard? If
yes, can you tell me where I can find it. If not, is there a way to provide
some translations for the document?

Thank you for your contribution to the standard.

Date/Time: Sat Feb 20 22:58:10 CST 2016
Name: eriice
Report Type: Other Question, Problem, or Feedback
Opt Subject:

Section 3.2 Bidirectional Character Types, Unicode Standard Annex #9, Version:
Unicode 8.0.0

URL:http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#Bidirectional_Character_Types

Hello, There is a small writing mistake in it. You can find it in section 3.2
Bidirectional Character Types. In this section, text about "See Section 8.2,
Arabic of [Unicode]" should be corrected to "See Section 9.2", because the
section "Arabic" appear in Section 9.2 instead of Section 8.2 of Unicode.You
can check it in the following URL.

http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode8.0.0/ch09.pdf

Furthermore, are there any language translation about the Unicode Standard? If
yes, can you tell me where I can find it. If not, is there a way to provide
some translations for the document? Thank you.

Date/Time: Tue Mar 29 18:00:36 CDT 2016
Name: eriice
Report Type: Other Question, Problem, or Feedback
Opt Subject: About counting mistake

Hello, There may be an counting error in UNICODE BIDIRECTIONAL ALGORITHM. You
can find it in section 3.1, Definitions. In this section, the number in text
about "A total of 125 levels is far more than sufficient for ordering... "
should be count as 126, In the above, "The minimum embedding level of text is
zero, and the maximum explicit depth is 125". There are 126 Numbers in 0 to
125. In my understanding that the maximum depth 125 isn't over the depth limit
and the first number beyond depth limit is 126.

URL:http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#Basics

Thank you.

Date/Time: Sun May 1 15:51:35 CDT 2016
Name: Marcin Grzegorczyk
Report Type: Error Report
Opt Subject: UAX 9 feedback (PRI #315)

Editorial remark: In the definition BD16 and the following note, the terms
“opening paired bracket”, “closing paired bracket” and “isolating run
sequence” are italicized every time they appear in the text. Elsewhere in the
document, only the defining instance of a term is italicized.