On 6/6/97 12:02 AM Kai-hsu Tai ([email protected]) wrote:
>So, pertaining to Unicode, here is the issue. If U+9EC3 and U+9EC4 are
>listed at different codepoints, shouldn't all the followers (U+9EC5 to
>U+9ECC) have duplicate codepoints too? Or is this because that the source
>character sets didn't have the unlisted counterparts? I haven't got time
>to look at these characters in the TUS CD, and don't care enough either.
>
U+9EC3 and U+9EC4 are separated only because of the source code
separation rule (they're both in CNS 11643).
=====
John H. Jenkins
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.blueneptune.com/~tseng
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:34 EDT