Ar 14:13 -0800 1997-11-21, scr�obh John Cowan:
>Also, is Coptic caseless? The Coptic-unique letters in Unicode
>are given in two cases, but the difference appears to be one of
>size only. I don't find any bicameral Coptic fonts or texts
>anywhere on the Web.
Coptic is not caseless. In "Les caract�res de l'Imprimerie Nationale", pp.
248, 251, for instance, a printed text is presented with clear and distinct
capital letters (ALFA, EIE, MI, NI, O, PI, TAU, HORI, GANGIA), shaped
differently from the small letters.
The horizontal bar used above Coptic letters to show syllabism is very
important. The Coptic fonts I have seen all encode them as separate
characters (not decomposed).
The Imprimerie Nationale says that "la voyelle e, qui peut �tre
sous-entendue dans l'�criture, sera marqu�e sur la premi�re consonne du mot
par un trait horizontal dans le copte th�bain, et par un accent grave pour
le copte memphitique ; dans le corps d'un mot, elle se traduit commun�ment
par un trait sup�rieir couvrant plusieres consonnes."
Might this mean that a Coptic-specific mark should be encoded? Could a
smart "Memphitic" font then display a text with a grave glyph in
word-initial position? I should think that this would be better than using
COMBINING MACRON or COMBINING GRAVE.
-- Michael Everson, EGT * http://www.indigo.ie/egt 15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire (Ireland) Guth�in: +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396 27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:38 EDT