Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols

From: John Cowan ([email protected])
Date: Mon Nov 23 1998 - 12:47:35 EST

Next message: John Jenkins: "Re: Arabic Presentation Forms-B"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
Maybe in reply to: Markus Kuhn: "Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson wrote:

> Maybe in some early printed texts where xiij was written, and no dots on
> them. Heh.

A mere-shmere glyph variant, says I.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		[email protected]
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

Next message: John Jenkins: "Re: Arabic Presentation Forms-B"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
Maybe in reply to: Markus Kuhn: "Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
Next in thread: Rick McGowan: "Re: Glyphs of new Unicode 3.0 symbols"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:43 EDT