Re: dotless j

From: John Cowan ([email protected])
Date: Sun Jul 04 1999 - 14:44:47 EDT

Next message: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Previous message: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Maybe in reply to: Luke Stevens: "dotless j"
Next in thread: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson scripsit:

> >What would you call it? DOTLESS PRESENTATION FORM OF LATIN SMALL LETTER J?
>
> LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS J would do just fine.

But that would imply that there is such a letter, whereas there is not.
Such a glyph would be provided for convenience and compatibility only.

-- 
John Cowan                                   [email protected]
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Next message: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Previous message: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Maybe in reply to: Luke Stevens: "dotless j"
Next in thread: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT