Re: dotless j

From: Edward Cherlin (edward.cherlin.sy.67@aya.yale.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 05 1999 - 00:14:12 EDT

Next message: Edward Cherlin: "Frank & Ed"
Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "Re: Dickey vs. Cherlin, was Re: Plain Text"
Maybe in reply to: Luke Stevens: "dotless j"
Next in thread: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 16:14 -0700 7/4/1999, John Cowan wrote:
>Roozbeh Pournader scripsit:
>
>> If only I could find the person who suggested the Arabic presentation
>> forms to be in Unicode... ;)
>
>He was openly named on this list a few months ago, so a search of the
>archives would be the thing.
>
>--
>John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
> I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Never mind him, go for whoever decided that 11,172 precomposed Johab Hangul
syllables should be in KSC 5601 and hence in Unicode instead of being font
glyphs. (Unicode Version 2.0, pp. 6-114--115, 7-420--469) :-[

--
Edward Cherlin       A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when
cherlin@newbie.net        there is nothing left to add, but when there is
Ask--Someone knows   nothing left to take away.--Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
http://www.newbie.net/Mentors/Cherlin/Newbie_Pages/new39.html (Anti-Spam)

Next message: Edward Cherlin: "Frank & Ed"
Previous message: Edward Cherlin: "Re: Dickey vs. Cherlin, was Re: Plain Text"
Maybe in reply to: Luke Stevens: "dotless j"
Next in thread: G. Adam Stanislav: "Re: dotless j"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT