Re: dotless j

From: Marion Gunn (mgunn@egt.ie)
Date: Mon Jul 05 1999 - 17:32:15 EDT


Ar 20:19 -0000 1999-07-05, scríobh Timothy Partridge:
>Can I interest you in the possibility of LATIN SMALL LETTER DOTLESS LONG I?
>It looks just like a dotless j. (LATIN SMALL LETTER LONG I would be unified
>with LATIN SMALL LETTER J.)
>
>In England in the 11th and 12th centuries i was written without a dot. It
>was common to write the i at the end of a word in a long form which looks
>like a dotless j.
>...
> Tim

In Irish too, and not just in the past, Tim! That dotless long i is what I
write, when using my native script other than with a computer. I have to
confess to having used the Turkish dotless i, and would even use a dotless
j, if that were available, as a long-i substitute (as would many a
non-fontmaker, who might not know/care about the problems thus caused,
should text need to be transferred any further than the nearest consenting
printer). Is it possible that what Tim suggests might be practical,
Michael, and acceptable to a Unicode majority?
mg

--
Marion Gunn
Everson Gunn Teoranta
27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Áth Cliath; Éire (Ireland)
+353-1-283 9396, +353-1-478 2597. <http://www.indigo.ie/egt>
15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire (Ireland)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:48 EDT