Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters

From: Mark E. Davis (markdavis@ispchannel.com)
Date: Fri Oct 01 1999 - 10:24:20 EDT

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Ogham & Runic"
Maybe in reply to: Marion Gunn: "A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This is not a problem, since 226E remains as is in Normalization Form C,
which will be the recommended form for XML.

John Cowan wrote:

> I wrote:
>
> > However, I will bring up the matter of U+226C in XML content to the
> > appropriate parties.
>
> That should have U+226E, as two vigilant recipients have pointed out.
> I have posted to the W3C i18n mailing list.
>
> --
> John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
> I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin

Next message: John Cowan: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Ogham & Runic"
Maybe in reply to: Marion Gunn: "A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT