In message <199910011421.HAA10109@unicode.org>
"Mark E. Davis" <markdavis@ispchannel.com> wrote:
> This is not a problem, since 226E remains as is in Normalization Form C,
> which will be the recommended form for XML.
>
But it might be a problem for an unwitting implementor who runs everything
through a decomposition engine on input, and is looking only for '<', rather
than '<'+{non-combining character}.
-- Kevin Bracey, Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology plc Tel: +44 (0) 1223 518566 645 Newmarket Road Fax: +44 (0) 1223 518526 Cambridge, CB5 8PB, United Kingdom WWW: http://www.acorn.co.uk/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT