Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters

From: Kevin Bracey ([email protected])
Date: Fri Oct 01 1999 - 12:03:04 EDT

Next message: Joshi Sandeep: "NT & UTF8"
Previous message: John Jenkins: "Re: Ogham & Runic"
Maybe in reply to: Marion Gunn: "A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Next in thread: Mark E. Davis: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In message <[email protected]>
"Mark E. Davis" <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is not a problem, since 226E remains as is in Normalization Form C,
> which will be the recommended form for XML.
>

But it might be a problem for an unwitting implementor who runs everything
through a decomposition engine on input, and is looking only for '<', rather
than '<'+{non-combining character}.

-- 
Kevin Bracey, Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology plc                     Tel: +44 (0) 1223 518566
645 Newmarket Road                            Fax: +44 (0) 1223 518526
Cambridge, CB5 8PB, United Kingdom            WWW: http://www.acorn.co.uk/

Next message: Joshi Sandeep: "NT & UTF8"
Previous message: John Jenkins: "Re: Ogham & Runic"
Maybe in reply to: Marion Gunn: "A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Next in thread: Mark E. Davis: "Re: A basic question on encoding Latin characters"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT