RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Mon Oct 04 1999 - 12:31:05 EDT


Ar 09:02 -0700 1999-10-04, scr�obh [email protected]:

>John Cowan replied:
>>Combining-slash decompositions are considered to be over the top:
>>they're impossible to recombine at the glyph level accurately,
>>because the position of the slash varies randomly depending on the
>>base letter.
>
>This is not very convincing. The same thing is true also with many other
>combining characters. Even a diaresis, or an acute accent do look different
>on different base characters (e.g. small and capital letters).

As a font designer I assure you it is quite convincing. The "floating"
diacritics can interact with the bounding box. Superimposed diacritics have
to interact in other ways.

--
Michael Everson * Everson Gunn Teoranta * http://www.indigo.ie/egt
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Guth�n: +353 1 478 2597 ** Facsa: +353 1 478 2597 (by arrangement)
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn;  Baile an Bh�thair;  Co. �tha Cliath; �ire



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT