Re: Schutz-Staffel symbol

From: Patrick Andries (pandries@iti.qc.ca)
Date: Mon Oct 04 1999 - 12:59:00 EDT

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER REVERSED K?"
Maybe in reply to: Herman Ranes: "Schutz-Staffel symbol"
Next in thread: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: Schutz-Staffel symbol"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Michael Everson <everson@indigo.ie>
À : Unicode List <unicode@unicode.org>
Date : 4 oct. 1999 12:41
Objet : Re: Schutz-Staffel symbol

>One would need to see the plain text requirement before considering this
>further. Was it really "frequently encountered in book and newspaper
>articles"?

So much so that the IIIrd Reich typewriters had a special "SS" runic key, if
I remember correctly.
I should be able to find a photograph of such a typewriter.

P. Andries

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Re: metalanguage (was RE: Why is Unicode inconsistant?)"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER REVERSED K?"
Maybe in reply to: Herman Ranes: "Schutz-Staffel symbol"
Next in thread: Marco.Cimarosti@icl.com: "RE: Schutz-Staffel symbol"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:53 EDT