Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)

From: Hirotaka Yoshioka ([email protected])
Date: Wed Oct 20 1999 - 03:30:42 EDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: verification: RE: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER REVERSED K?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Maybe reply: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson wrote:
> >>Klingons rear their noble foreheads again. {{:-)
> >
> >There is already a proposal for adding Klingon to UniCode so we can ignore
> >them.
>
> I know. I wrote it. See http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm

Is it a joke or serious proposal?

Regards,
Hiro

-- 
Hiro Yoshioka/Principal Engineer
mailto:[email protected] (office)
http://www.best.com/~yoshioka/d/98/
The statements, views and opinions expressed here are my own 
and do not necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: verification: RE: LATIN CAPITAL LETTER REVERSED K?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Maybe reply: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: Do we need a Klingon in Unicode (was Re: What happened to ....?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:54 EDT