Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?

• Next message: peter_constable@sil.org: "Re: Mixed up priorities"
• Previous message: Jonathan Rosenne: "Re: UTR# 15 - Objection to Hebrew Exclusions"
• Next in thread: Virginia Anderson: "Re: Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?"
• Maybe reply: Virginia Anderson: "Re: Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?"
• Maybe reply: Tom Emerson: "RE: Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This is not entirely on topic, I realise, but nor is it entirely off.

I am interested to know what is happening in Kong Kong with regards to the
use of traditional or simplified forms of Chinese ideographs. Is there
pressure from the central government in Beijing for Hong Kong to adopt the
simplified forms? Or are the Hong Kong Chinese to continue using the
traditional forms?

If anyone knows of any URLs or publications with information on this
situation, please send me e-mail. Thanks.

John Hudson

Tiro Typeworks
Vancouver, BC
www.tiro.com
tiro@tiro.com

• Next message: peter_constable@sil.org: "Re: Mixed up priorities"
• Previous message: Jonathan Rosenne: "Re: UTR# 15 - Objection to Hebrew Exclusions"
• Next in thread: Virginia Anderson: "Re: Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?"
• Maybe reply: Virginia Anderson: "Re: Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?"
• Maybe reply: Tom Emerson: "RE: Traditional/Simplified Chinese forms in Hong Kong?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:54 EDT