Re: Latin Ligatures and Unicode

From: Michael Everson ([email protected])
Date: Thu Dec 30 1999 - 14:50:03 EST

Next message: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: ZWL, ZWNL no difference?"
Previous message: [email protected]: "Re: Letter Spacing and ligature formation"
Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "Re: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Ar 10:34 -0800 1999-12-30, scr�obh [email protected]:

> John, are the varieties of Latin script where ligation is
> required for minimal legibility not merely typeface variants?

Fraktur. That's why the ligatures are "obligatory".

Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie
15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland
Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169
27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire

Next message: Robert A. Rosenberg: "Re: ZWL, ZWNL no difference?"
Previous message: [email protected]: "Re: Letter Spacing and ligature formation"
Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "Re: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Next in thread: [email protected]: "Re: Latin ligatures and Unicode"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jul 10 2001 - 17:20:57 EDT